
For public boards of education and local government councils, livestreamed meetings are a powerful tool for engaging the community and building trust. They are also, increasingly, a legal requirement for public facing boards.
At the federal level, the Open Meetings Act requires disclosure of records and meetings, and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) stipulates detailed requirements for in-person and virtual accessibility, from captions to sign language interpretation. At the state and local levels, however, policies vary widely, with a mosaic of jurisdictional norms and requirements that seem to change by the day.
An overview follows of livestreaming regulations in the U.S., diving deeper into:
Legal compliance is just one of many reasons your board should embrace livestreamed public meetings. Importantly, livestreaming provides the transparency and accountability that build community trust.
Livestreaming allows the public to participate in meetings and events even if they cannot attend in person. It makes the meetings accessible to individuals with disabilities, those who live far from the meeting location, or those who have scheduling conflicts. After the fact, video archives provide a digital record that can be accessed for future reference.
This means that members of your community can see how decisions are being made on their behalf, with an openly available record of who said what.
"Embracing livestreamed meetings is not merely about compliance; it’s about cultivating transparency and trust within our communities. As regulations continue to evolve, school boards and local governments must adapt to ensure accessibility and engagement for all. By doing so, we not only meet legal requirements but also strengthen community engagement and encourage greater participation." - Kristin Karel, Sales Director for Public Sector Governance at Diligent Corporation
Legal requirements for livestreaming public meetings vary widely from state to state, with more and more states requiring this or a similar practice or entertaining proposals for such a mandate.
Live meeting feeds and archived recordings are increasingly becoming the rule of law across the United States, as the examples below illustrate:
As pressure increases for public engagement and transparency, more states may soon join the roster above — for example:
Watch the landscape closely. A state like Alaska may currently have no official requirements for meeting minutes or recordings, but this situation could change any day. Or maybe a proposal related to virtual meetings recently stalled, as was the case in California. This momentum could quickly resume with new technologies, shifting norms and public sentiment.
In the meantime, look at what other municipal and public education boards are doing to engage their stakeholders and be transparent in their work. Draw from their examples to shape your own activities
Finally, keep a close eye on the fine details related to virtual participation and recordings. Some of these can be very specific, as the following examples demonstrate.
“Livestreaming has become a staple of local government and public education — citizens and community members expect to have access to meetings and conversations among their elected leaders. Livestreaming gives leaders a chance to display transparency and foster trust among their constituents. And in today’s digital world, people rely on the ability to be able to watch a stream for a meeting they might not be able to attend live.” - Brian Lee, VP of Sales + Customer Success, BoxCast
With more and more members of the public carrying a portable video device in the form of their smartphone, you’ll need to be aware of these rules. In Alabama and Pennsylvania, meeting attendees are allowed to record a public meeting as long as their actions are not disruptive.
Idaho authorizes audio conference calls if at least one member of the governing body is present at the physical meeting location and if the meeting is audible to all members in attendance.
Tennessee similarly allows “internet forums,” as long as they don’t “act as a substitute for decision making by a governing body at a meeting held in accordance with the Tennessee Open Meetings Act.”
In Washington State, all school districts must save audio recordings of school board meetings for at least one year. In Oregon, school and education service and community colleges must video record meetings and post the recordings online within seven days, with an audio recording allowed if broadband internet access is unavailable.
As a board secretary or clerk, it’s your job to know the rules of the road, from data privacy concerns and copyright issues to public notifications and beyond. And even if your official job title isn’t AV manager, you’re responsible for technical details like the quality of the stream, the reliability of the platform, and the security of the data transmitted.
How do you make sure your livestreamed meetings meet the compliance requirements of regulators and the needs of your community?
After checking overall livestreaming requirements at the federal, state and local levels, delve deeper into details like:
Your house rules may need to adapt to livestreaming technologies and virtual participation. This means you’ll need to take a look at things like:
As the regulatory landscape continues to take shape, execution matters, as implementation challenges related to Hawaii’s 2022 open meetings law demonstrate. “Several government board meetings including panels on wastewater and game were canceled in January due to the lack of functioning Zoom links and a failure to provide contact information on the public meeting agendas.”
Don’t let connectivity and IT glitches annoy your community, weaken your credibility and threaten public trust. Before you start livestreaming, go through a technical walk-through with your IT and AV teammates to review:
After each meeting, consider gathering feedback from community members and meeting participants about their experiences. Also look at audience engagement metrics such as viewership numbers to guide future efforts.
Check out our comprehensive — and continually updated — regulatory roundups for board training, AI and more.
Download this helpful checklist for more detail on vendor evaluation, technical set-up and logistical preparations.
Go deeper into legal mandates, best practices and platforms, including real-life case studies, with this comprehensive guide to compliant livestreaming.
Dive into why public boards should resist the temptation of social media platforms for their livestreaming needs.
Read about livestreaming’s potential to attract new residents and families to your community, building confidence in the school system and city council.
Discover how Glenbrook High School District 225 in Illinois moved from cumbersome off-the-shelf solutions to Diligent Community Livestream Manager, to improve livestreaming quality and increase community engagement. A split screen view provides the public with the ability to listen, watch and actively review resources that the board references during deliberations. Attendees can also access captions, while recordings are saved for easy search afterwards.
You’ve read about the trends. You have the tools and tactics. Now it’s time to bring technology into the equation.
It may be tempting to turn to a general-use videoconferencing service or social media streaming platform. For security and compliance reasons alone, resist this temptation. A specialized livestreaming platform, integrated into a comprehensive governance platform, will deliver the quality, scalability and confidence you need, along with seamless administration.
Diligent Community delivers all of these benefits and more, bringing super-reliable live HD video — backed by best-in-class provider BoxCast — and Livestream Manager together into a meeting experience that pleases regulators, board members and your community, now and as the landscape evolves.
Schedule a demo today.