
Whether they're required or not, board self-evaluations are considered best practices for good corporate governance. Nonprofits, charitable boards and for-profit boards of every size and in every industry have much to gain from a board evaluation report. Board directors are scrutinized more carefully than ever before due to the fallout of poorly performing boards. In certain circumstances, boards can be held accountable for making bad decisions, which can affect their livelihood and finances in major ways. Recently, according to a study by PwC, 74% of directors believe that board evaluations are an effective tool to enhance board performance, but only 58% of directors made changes to various board practices following a board evaluation.
Board evaluation reports are a critical structural tool for evaluating how effective and efficient boards are. In some regions and jurisdictions, boards evaluate individual directors as well as the entire board's performance. Where individual director assessments aren't required, many boards conduct them to help improve individual performances.
In this article, we’re going to explore board evaluation reports and why they’re so important. We will cover:
A board evaluation report is a document that assesses the performance and effectiveness of an organization’s board of directors. It also ensures the board is doing everything by the book, fulfilling its fiduciary duties and meeting governance standards.
The report is compiled to include feedback and data from board members, executives and sometimes external stakeholders. It will look at all aspects of a board's performance, including its decision-making process, leadership style, strategies and competencies. Based on this, the board can make improvements to help secure the future of the organization.
Board evaluations are important as an organization is only as effective as its board. Regular board evaluations allow for continuous improvements, which can:
All boards set goals for the company or organization they serve. Board evaluations provide an opportunity for boards to assess themselves and measure their performance against the goals and objectives they've set during their strategic planning. We can easily classify the roles of boards of directors into three broad categories:
In simplified terms, a board performance evaluation report shows how effectively the board performs its roles, along with its related duties and responsibilities.
According to a Deloitte report, boards should assess the following seven areas of performance, at a minimum:
Boards may identify additional areas that they want to explore and assess. Corporations are unique because of their size, industry and business development cycle. Board evaluation reports aren't intended to be cookie-cutter copies of other companies or close replicas of board evaluation reports from previous years.
Once you have compiled a board evaluation report, it needs to be presented to stakeholders to ensure transparency and build trust. Even findings that aren’t particularly rosy should be included so stakeholders have a complete picture of the board’s performance and the strategies to rectify any issues.
Here are three tips for how you can effectively present your board evaluation report to stakeholders:
Make sure to understand your audience and tailor the content to what’s likely to resonate with them. This could involve preparing slightly different versions of a presentation. For example, stakeholders will want to know more about governance practices and finances, while employees will want to know more about culture and processes.
Practice presenting the report and try to anticipate questions. It’s important to have answers so you can address even the most difficult topics.
Visualizations and graphics can help your audience digest what you’re presenting. Present in a structured manner, a little like telling a story, to keep your audience invested and engaged.
Presenting your report isn’t one way, so encourage your audience to ask questions, make comments and share their thoughts. Open, honest communication is vital, and you also have to actively listen to feedback and respond thoughtfully. You must show stakeholders that you value their input.
You also need to bear in mind that stakeholders will have a wide range of opinions, expectations and ideas, but it’s usually possible to find common ground. Record all feedback and share follow-up communication with stakeholders to show that you take it seriously.
Following the presentation, there are likely to be a lot of questions around “What’s next?” which could be influenced by the feedback you received. It’s important to ensure stakeholders know what the board intends to do and by when by establishing measurable goals.
Provide stakeholders with regular updates so they’re kept in the loop. You may also want to schedule further presentations and encourage a constant flow of communication from both sides.
The biggest positive you can take from a board evaluation is identifying how to make improvements to the way your board of directors operates. You’ll gain actionable insights to make changes to board governance and performance. Here’s how to utilize your report to ensure continuous improvement:
The U.K. Corporate Governance Code Annual recommends that boards evaluate boards, committees and individual directors annually. FTSE 350 companies should have evaluations done by a third party at least every three years on a comply-or-explain basis.
The U.S. National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) recommends that boards assign the responsibility for board evaluations to their governance committees. NACD recommends full board, committee and individual director evaluations on a regular basis.
The IBGC Code of Best Practices recommends annual evaluations of the board, individual directors, and the CEO and that the board chair conducts the evaluation. Outside facilitators are welcome, and boards should disclose results to shareholders.
CNV recommends annual board evaluations.
Mexico expects boards to do board self-evaluations as a matter of their fiduciary duties.
Evaluations in Japan are rooted in traditional values and culture. They generally focus on processes and compliance and follow guidelines outlined in the Japan Corporate Governance Code.
Evaluations in Australia are influenced by the ASX Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations. The guidelines state that evaluations should be annual and should include individual and board evaluations.
French organizations conduct evaluations according to the AFEP-MEDEF Code, which focuses on improving governance and board effectiveness.
The GCGC recommends that organizations conduct regular evaluations that focus on efficiency, transparency and accountability.
Evaluations are influenced by the Canadian Coalition for Good Governance (CCGG), which states that organizations should conduct evaluations each year.
OECD members recommend that the boards of listed companies conduct annual evaluations of the board and individual directors.
While board directors acknowledge the value and importance of completing their board evaluation questions, it's not a favorite task because it takes time away from other duties. Diligent created a software program that takes the pain out of board assessments. With the Diligent Boards questionnaire feature, facilitators can customize assessments with multiple user-tested question types, incorporate glossaries and supplemental reference information, monitor submissions and finalize questionnaires with e-signatures. It couldn't be easier to get accurate, custom reports. Boards can easily export results and graphs within a few clicks, removing the frustration of time-consuming manual processes.
Diligent Boards, part of the Diligent One Platform, , is a fully integrated board portal system for a total enterprise governance management system. Try it today and experience just how efficient it can be to produce a board evaluation report at your organization. Download our buyer’s guide to see exactly what Diligent can do to streamline your reporting process.