Diligent Logo
Blog
/
Boards & Governance
Meghan Day Image
Meghan Day
Principal Solution Designer

Making AI part of your GRC strategy: A checklist for boards and leaders

November 28, 2025
0 min read
Woman analyzing data displayed on a screen

According to the GC Risk Index from Diligent Institute and Corporate Board Member, business risk has surged 36% since the start of 2025, with general counsel and compliance leaders rating the current risk environment at 7.9 out of 10 — up from just 5.8 in Q1.

As geopolitical pressures combine with regulatory volatility and tariff disruptions, companies face mounting pressure to move beyond reactive compliance toward proactive risk intelligence. AI-enabled governance, risk and compliance (GRC) provides the answer.

Board directors see the opportunity. According to the Director Confidence Index by Diligent Institute and Corporate Board Member, 64% identify AI adoption as their organization's biggest opportunity. Yet only 10% use AI regularly for oversight purposes

This disconnect reveals a critical challenge: Organizations recognize AI's transformative potential for governance, risk and compliance functions, but struggle to move from consideration to effective implementation.

For companies preparing for transactions, building institutional-grade governance or scaling compliance operations without proportional headcount growth, AI-powered GRC platforms deliver the strategic intelligence that stakeholders expect.

The question? How do governance teams implement it effectively? To this end, this article covers:

  • What AI-enabled GRC means and why it transforms traditional approaches
  • Eight practical steps for implementing AI across governance, risk and compliance functions
  • How AI technology transforms GRC operations

What is AI-enabled governance, risk and compliance (GRC)?

AI-enabled GRC is the application of artificial intelligence to three core governance jobs: monitoring compliance obligations, identifying and assessing risks, and maintaining control effectiveness across your organization.

The technology combines two distinct AI capabilities:

  • Automated monitoring and analysis: Machine learning systems continuously scan regulatory sources, operational data and control activities. These systems flag changes, identify anomalies and detect emerging risks without manual intervention.
  • Generative AI for synthesis and insight: Large language models analyze complex information, generate summaries, answer questions about governance requirements and provide recommendations based on patterns across your risk landscape.

Together, these technologies transform how companies manage governance, risk and compliance:

Traditional GRC approach:

  • Compliance teams review regulations quarterly
  • Risk managers assess threats twice a year
  • Boards receive reports monthly
  • Manual processes limit coverage and speed

AI-enabled GRC approach:

  • Systems scan regulatory changes daily across all relevant jurisdictions
  • Continuous monitoring flags new risks as they emerge
  • Board dashboards update in real time with synthesized intelligence
  • Generative AI answers specific governance questions on demand

Think of it as the difference between a security guard who walks the building every four hours versus security cameras that watch continuously, combined with an AI analyst who can instantly answer "What security incidents occurred last week?" or "Which areas show the highest risk patterns?"

From traditional GRC to AI-enabled GRC

Traditional GRC approaches rely on periodic reviews, sample-based testing and quarterly reporting that provide point-in-time snapshots of organizational risk.

By the time compliance teams identify regulatory changes, risk assessments reach executive leadership, or audit findings surface control gaps, the business environment has often evolved beyond the data being analyzed.

AI-enabled GRC replaces this reactive approach with continuous monitoring across all risk domains:

  • Regulatory intelligence platforms scan thousands of sources daily, identifying relevant changes
  • Risk management systems process real-time operational data, flagging anomalies and emerging threats before they become material issues
  • Compliance monitoring tools conduct continuous control testing rather than sample-based reviews, identifying gaps as they occur instead of discovering them during annual audits
  • Board management platforms synthesize disparate information into coherent intelligence
  • Policy management systems track regulatory updates and automatically flag where internal policies need revision to maintain alignment
  • Audit planning algorithms analyze risk patterns to prioritize high-impact areas, directing internal audit resources where they'll deliver the most value
  • Third-party risk monitoring analyzes vendor performance, regulatory compliance and financial stability signals continuously rather than during annual vendor reviews

Business benefits beyond compliance

While AI-enabled GRC begins with compliance efficiency, the strategic value extends far beyond regulatory adherence. Beyond compliance efficiency, AI-enabled GRC delivers strategic value across multiple dimensions.

Decision velocity increases as executives access real-time risk intelligence rather than waiting for quarterly reports. When boards evaluate acquisitions, expansion opportunities or strategic pivots, AI systems can provide immediate analysis of regulatory requirements, compliance costs and risk exposures that inform go/no-go decisions.

Resource optimization allows compliance and audit teams to focus expertise on judgment-intensive advisory work rather than manual data gathering. Additionally, stakeholder confidence strengthens when companies demonstrate sophisticated risk management capabilities to investors, acquirers and regulators.

8 steps to implement AI across your GRC functions

Moving from AI consideration to actual adoption requires systematic planning that addresses technology selection, organizational readiness and governance frameworks.

These eight steps provide a practical roadmap for implementation:

1. Assess current GRC operations and identify high-impact opportunities

The first step toward building stronger AI-powered GRC processes is looking at the processes you currently have — and, more importantly, where they're letting you down.

Begin by documenting existing workflows to understand where manual processes create bottlenecks, compliance gaps emerge, or strategic intelligence fails to reach decision-makers in time to influence outcomes.

Focus diagnostic efforts on three critical areas:

  • Time-intensive activities that consume professional capacity
  • High-risk processes where errors create material exposures
  • Information flows where delays impact business decisions

For board preparation workflows, measure administrative hours required for meeting materials compilation, version control challenges when multiple contributors update content and time lag between operational developments and board awareness. These metrics establish a baseline performance that AI implementation improves.

In compliance monitoring, assess regulatory update identification speed, policy review cycle times and control testing coverage. And for risk management, evaluate assessment frequency, mitigation tracking effectiveness and board reporting clarity.

2. Define SMART objectives aligned with business priorities

Transform diagnostic findings into SMART goals — specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and timely — that connect GRC improvements to business outcomes stakeholders care about.

For organizations preparing for transactions, objectives should emphasize governance maturity signals that influence valuations and accelerate due diligence.

Target metrics might include "achieve 100% control testing coverage prior to due diligence kickoff" or "reduce compliance exception resolution time from 45 days to 10 days."

Growth-stage companies scaling operations might prioritize objectives like "maintain compliance monitoring effectiveness while revenue doubles without proportional GRC headcount increase" or "reduce regulatory compliance cost-per-dollar-revenue by 40% through automation."

Public companies managing complex oversight requirements often focus on board effectiveness metrics such as "increase director preparation time for strategic discussion by 50% through administrative automation" or "reduce time from risk identification to board awareness from 3 weeks to 3 days."

3. Select AI-powered GRC platforms built for your scale and complexity

Technology selection determines implementation success more than any other factor. The platform you choose should match your organization's current sophistication while providing room to grow as requirements evolve.

Evaluate platforms based on four critical capabilities:

  • Domain-specific AI training: General-purpose AI systems lack the specialized understanding required for governance, risk and compliance applications. Platforms purpose-built for GRC should demonstrate AI models trained on regulatory content, risk frameworks and governance workflows rather than generic business intelligence.
  • Integration architecture: Your AI platform must connect seamlessly with existing business systems — ERP platforms, financial reporting tools, document management systems and communication channels.
  • Transparent operations: "Black box" AI systems that cannot explain their recommendations create governance risks rather than solving them. Platforms should provide clear audit trails showing how AI reached conclusions, which data sources informed the analysis and what human oversight validated outputs.
  • Scalability for growth: Your platform should handle current requirements while accommodating expansion — additional users, new business units, increased data volumes and evolving regulatory requirements.

Explore AI-powered GRC solutions

Discover how Diligent delivers the governance intelligence and risk oversight capabilities that match your organization's scale and complexity.

See Diligent in action

4. Develop implementation plans addressing people, process and technology

Successful AI implementation extends far beyond software deployment. Organizations should also address organizational readiness, process redesign and change management systematically.

Your implementation plan should cover:

  • Data preparation and quality assurance: AI systems deliver insights only as reliable as the data they analyze. Before deployment, audit existing data for completeness, consistency and accuracy. Additionally, establish data governance standards that define ownership, validation procedures and maintenance responsibilities.
  • Integration architecture and workflow design: Map how AI capabilities connect to existing processes and where automation replaces manual steps. Then, design workflows that preserve human oversight at critical decision points while eliminating low-value manual tasks.
  • Training programs and change enablement: Successful AI adoption requires helping teams understand capabilities, recognize appropriate use cases and develop trust in system recommendations. Training should address both technical operation and strategic application — not just "how to use the system" but "how to leverage AI for better risk decisions."
  • Security controls and access governance: Establish who can access AI systems, what data they can analyze and what actions they can authorize. This governance framework should address data privacy requirements, regulatory compliance mandates and internal control standards.

5. Establish AI governance frameworks and ethical use policies

As AI becomes embedded in GRC operations, organizations need governance structures that ensure responsible deployment, manage associated risks and satisfy board oversight requirements.

The GC Risk Index shows us that only 29% of organizations have comprehensive AI governance plans, while another 38% are actively drafting guidelines. Yet 44% of compliance leaders say their current policies need refinement, and 33% consider them entirely insufficient. This gap between adoption and governance maturity creates significant risk.

Your AI governance framework should address:

  • Accountability structures
  • Ethical principles and bias mitigation
  • Regulatory compliance alignment
  • Performance monitoring and continuous improvement

6. Implement training programs that build organizational AI literacy

Technology adoption succeeds only when people understand capabilities, trust recommendations and apply tools effectively. Training programs should address both technical proficiency and strategic judgment.

Structure training across three levels:

  • Executive awareness: Board members and C-suite leaders need a high-level understanding of AI capabilities, governance requirements and strategic implications. This training should address: What AI can and cannot do in GRC contexts, how AI governance frameworks protect the organization, what oversight questions boards should ask management and how AI transforms competitive positioning.
  • Practitioner proficiency: GRC professionals who use AI systems daily require deep technical knowledge and hands-on practice. Training should cover platform operation, interpretation of AI recommendations, when to override system suggestions and how to leverage AI for strategic analysis.
  • Organization-wide change enablement: Broader employee populations affected by AI-powered GRC processes need an understanding of how changes impact their work. This might include business unit leaders providing risk information to AI-enhanced assessment processes, employees interacting with AI-powered compliance monitoring or managers using AI-generated analytics for operational decisions.

Training should not be one-time events but continuous programs that evolve as AI capabilities expand, new use cases emerge and organizational sophistication increases.

7. Deploy pilots that demonstrate value before enterprise-wide rollout

Don't attempt comprehensive AI implementation across all GRC functions simultaneously. Instead, successful organizations begin with focused pilots that deliver measurable results. These pilots build organizational confidence and generate executive support for broader deployment.

Select initial use cases based on three criteria:

  • High business impact
  • Clear success metrics that demonstrate value
  • A manageable scope that ensures rapid results

Strong pilot candidates often include board preparation automation, regulatory change monitoring or high-volume control testing where AI delivers obvious efficiency gains.

Consider a board governance pilot focused on a single committee. Implement AI-powered document synthesis for that committee's materials. Then measure three outcomes: preparation time reduction, director satisfaction improvement and discussion quality enhancement.

Success in this limited scope builds momentum for expansion across all board activities.

A compliance monitoring pilot might focus on a single regulatory domain — for example, data privacy requirements across operating jurisdictions. Measure how quickly AI identifies regulatory updates compared to manual monitoring, how accurately it assesses relevance and what time savings compliance teams achieve.

Risk management pilots often target specific risk categories where assessment frequency matters for business decisions. Implement continuous AI-powered monitoring for supply chain risks or cybersecurity threats, demonstrating how real-time intelligence changes decision-making compared to quarterly risk reviews.

"Trust is the number one thing. Once you have trust that the executive teams believe in the data, believe in the risk you are identifying, then you can have fulsome conversations, you can create change," says Tom Keaton, Vice President of Business & Product Strategy at Diligent.

Document pilot results comprehensively, capturing both quantitative metrics and qualitative feedback. This evidence base supports business cases for expanded deployment and helps refine implementation approaches before broader rollout.

8. Establish monitoring processes that optimize performance and scale strategically

AI systems improve through use, but only when organizations implement systematic monitoring that measures performance, identifies refinement opportunities and ensures continuous alignment with business objectives.

Your monitoring framework should assess:

  • Accuracy and reliability
  • Business value delivery
  • User adoption and satisfaction
  • Scalability readiness

Regular reviews — monthly for new implementations, quarterly for mature deployments — should assess these metrics, identify improvement opportunities and guide strategic decisions about capability expansion.

How AI technology transforms GRC operations

Effective GRC transformation requires platforms specifically designed for governance, risk and compliance challenges rather than generic AI tools adapted for these purposes.

Organizations should evaluate technology based on domain expertise, integration capabilities, transparency and scalability that match their specific requirements.

The Diligent One Platform provides unified GRC capabilities across your organization. The platform integrates regulatory compliance management, enterprise risk oversight, internal audit management and board governance into cohesive workflows.

This comprehensive approach eliminates data silos while streamlining governance as part of holistic oversight.

For organizations building enterprise risk management capabilities, Diligent ERM delivers AI-powered risk identification that benchmarks against 180,000+ real-world risks from public company disclosures, Moody's external risk intelligence and real-time reporting through interactive dashboards.

Diligent risk overview page, which is a great example of AI GRC in action

The platform enables centralized risk management across business units with workflow automation that scales from pre-IPO companies establishing foundational programs to global enterprises managing complex operations.

Companies launching risk programs with resource constraints can implement Diligent’s AI Risk Essentials in as little as seven days.

The solution provides AI-powered peer benchmarking that identifies relevant threats from public company disclosures, training tools and templates that accelerate program maturity and unified workflows that professionalize risk management without hiring consultants.

This entry point delivers immediate value while establishing foundations for comprehensive ERM as organizations scale.

Diligent risk assessment page, a key application of AI-enabled GRC

These integrated capabilities address the full GRC lifecycle. They cover initial risk identification, control implementation and board-level reporting in unified workflows. This eliminates the data silos and workflow friction that plague organizations assembling solutions from multiple point products.

Ready to see how AI-powered GRC transforms governance, risk and compliance operations? Request a demo to explore Diligent's integrated platform capabilities.

FAQs about implementing AI for GRC functions

How quickly can organizations implement AI-enabled GRC capabilities?

Implementation timelines vary based on organizational readiness, existing technology infrastructure and deployment scope. For focused solutions addressing specific pain points, organizations can achieve operational value within days to weeks.

AI Risk Essentials, for example, provides AI-powered risk identification in as little as seven days. Comprehensive enterprise implementations spanning board governance, risk management, compliance monitoring and internal audit typically require 3-6 months for full deployment.

How do AI-powered GRC platforms handle evolving regulatory requirements?

Leading platforms partner with regulatory content providers who monitor thousands of sources across jurisdictions, automatically updating regulation libraries as requirements change.

AI engines analyze these updates for organizational relevance, assess potential impacts on existing controls and recommend mitigation strategies. This continuous monitoring replaces manual regulatory tracking that typically identifies changes weeks after publication.

What role should boards play in AI governance oversight?

Boards should establish clear oversight structures for AI strategy, risk management and ethical deployment. This includes:

  • Reviewing and approving AI governance frameworks that define acceptable use cases
  • Monitoring significant AI implementations that impact strategic decisions or create material risks
  • Evaluating AI-related risks as part of enterprise risk oversight

Many boards establish dedicated technology or innovation committees that provide specialized AI oversight, particularly for organizations where AI capabilities create competitive advantages or significant operational dependencies.

Discover how Diligent's AI-powered platform transforms GRC operations from reactive compliance to strategic intelligence. Schedule a demo today.

security

Your Data Matters

At our core, transparency is key. We prioritize your privacy by providing clear information about your rights and facilitating their exercise. You're in control, with the option to manage your preferences and the extent of information shared with us and our partners.

© 2025 Diligent Corporation. All rights reserved.